Closely
tied to the status of being a “Pop Icon,” the cult of celebrity phenomenon is
almost always in existence. This is
especially true when we are discussing such demise of icons. Through the test of time, celebrities and
icons have shared the limelight with what society and culture deem heroic. However, these two theories defiantly can be distinguished
in different manners. Celebrity status
has often led stars to act out in ways that the public views as absurd. Living lavishly on life through outrageous
acts that only fuels societies desire to form obsessions with the expectations
that we have witnessed in such stars as Michael Jackson and Whitney Houston;
both of whom met their demise way too early.
What
is important to analyze however is how intertwined the terms hero and celebrity
have become. While the public views
celebrities as icons, they too expect a level of heroism from them as
well. Celebrities are seen as icons,
giving many societal members something to aspire for. Therefore, it is easy to see where the term
hero comes into play. While there is no
single act of valor from the celebrity they are still viewed as vibrant force
that is looked up to for guidance, this is especially true of the younger
generation.
Though examining these theories and
directly relating them to the demise of pop icons, we can begin to form
opinions on how these stars lives began to spiral out of control and how the pressure
eventually lead to untimely deaths as their reputation superseded their desire
and will to continue meeting the standards set for them. The lesson taken from such theories is that
celebrity status does not and will not ever constitute that of a hero when it
comes to celebrity demise. Instead, such
demise gives us knowledge into how such stigma can influence one’s own life to
where their own hero is gone; at which time their will to achieve higher status
leads to their own eventual death.
No comments:
Post a Comment